{"id":476,"date":"2023-10-17T19:59:46","date_gmt":"2023-10-17T19:59:46","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.seyyahizcilik.com\/?p=476"},"modified":"2023-10-17T20:08:43","modified_gmt":"2023-10-17T20:08:43","slug":"letters-proposition-hh-is-a-money-grab","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.seyyahizcilik.com\/index.php\/2023\/10\/17\/letters-proposition-hh-is-a-money-grab\/","title":{"rendered":"Letters: Proposition HH is a money grab"},"content":{"rendered":"

Prop HH is a money grab<\/h4>\n

Re: \u201cNovember\u2019s ballot showdown,\u201d Oct. 8 Pro<\/a> and Con<\/a> guest commentaries on Prop. HH<\/p>\n

Don\u2019t be fooled: Proposition HH uses so-called \u201cproperty tax relief\u201d to trick you into giving up some of your TABOR tax refunds! It\u2019s a tiny and temporary reduction in your property taxes to lure you into giving up one of the most fiscally responsible check and balance systems in the USA.<\/p>\n

TABOR allows state spending to increase over time, but only along with the size of our population and with inflation. Any extra revenue collected must be returned to the taxpayers. It is fair, reasonable, and responsible. Some people want the state legislature to spend all the money it can collect and never return the excess to us.<\/p>\n

Many of those people are in the legislature and they keep trying to find ways to stop TABOR and spend extra revenue on whatever they want. That is not fair, reasonable and responsible. They keep trying to kill TABOR through lawsuits and ballot initiatives. Now they are trying again with Proposition HH. This time they are preying on our statewide concern about rising property taxes.<\/p>\n

Dig into the long-term impact of HH and you\u2019ll see that our TABOR refunds will be significantly reduced. The worst part? They will give us a little bit back and call it property tax relief. It is not tax relief when they are supposed to give that money back to us anyway. Don\u2019t take the bait. Vote NO on Proposition HH.<\/p>\n

Laura Eicher, Highlands Ranch<\/em><\/p>\n

I have to add my voice to all the others who are talking out against this money grab named Prop HH. Hopefully, people will see that they want to put a dime in your left pocket and take a hundred-dollar bill out of your right pocket.<\/p>\n

The people in Denver should really pay attention since they voted in the forever sidewalk tax. HH is going to forever take away your TABOR refund, which is your protection from overspending politicians. The little they knock off your property tax will only be, hopefully, until next year when we can vote for Initiative 50, which will limit increases in property tax to just 4% per year. One year of biting the bullet will save TABOR. It has been keeping the spending in our state down since 1992.<\/p>\n

I still laugh when the politicians applaud themselves because they gave us our money early. That was sure nice of them since we know they hated doing it but wanted to use it as a campaign bribe.<\/p>\n

Dennis Lubbers, Littleton<\/em><\/p>\n

Yes, initiatives are a bad way to manage<\/h4>\n

Re: \u201cBallot initiatives are a terrible way to govern<\/a>,\u201d Oct. 8 commentary<\/p>\n

Let me state, right up front, that in theory, I completely agree with Krista Kafer that direct democracy is a terrible way to manage wildlife, and wildlife management should be the domain of trained, experienced professionals. Let me also state that I have only lived in Colorado for five years and do not have a great deal of experience with Colorado Parks and Wildlife\u2019s wildlife management. However, I moved to Colorado after a 30-year career in ecosystem management in Pennsylvania, where I interacted frequently with the Pennsylvania Game Commission.<\/p>\n